Dark Matter

What is the universe made of? Solar absorption spectra showed that the Sun contains familiar elements, and spectra of stars in distant galaxies also revealed their presence. Even exotic objects such as as white dwarfs, supernovas, and neutron stars contain the familiar building blocks of matter. As for galaxies, up until about 30 years ago, they appeared to be composed of protons, neutrons and electrons--called baryonic matter--but now it appears most of the mass in galaxies, and clusters of galaxies, is made of something else, a hitherto unobserved kind of matter. This conclusion is supported by a confluence of findings ranging from galactic rotation to cosmology to gravitational lensing.

Coma Cluster

This is the Coma cluster.  Studies of the motion of its outermost galaxies yield a much larger total mass than the mass that corresponds to the observed luminous matter. Image credit: Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Dynamics of Galactic Clusters

In 1938, Fritz Zwicky of Caltech found the first evidence of matter that interacts through gravitation but not through the electromagnetism, so it emits no light--hence the name "dark matter." Zwicky studied the statistics of the motion and location of galaxies in the Coma cluster, a gigantic system spanning more than 20,000,000 light-years (more than 200 times the size of a typical spiral galaxy).  Zwicky assumed the cluster was spherically symmetrical, so the mutual gravitational force of all the galaxies attracts each one toward the cluster's center, and on the average the outermost galaxies ought to move according to Newtonian mechanics under the influence of a mass equal to the total mass of the cluster (see sidebar).  By measuring the Doppler shifts of the spectral lines from these galaxies, Zwicky determined their average velocity.  Independently, he measured the radius of the cluster.  He calculated the total cluster mass necessary to produce the galactic motions that he had observed, and then, for comparison, he calculated the total mass based on the brightness of the galaxies. These two results were in violent disagreement--the mass based on the brightness of the galaxies was only about a 10th of the mass necessary to produce the observed motions.

The motion of galaxies in a spherical cluster is a central force problem, similar to the motion of the planets in circular orbits, but with randomness imposed by the mutual gravitational interactions of all the galaxies.  The main idea can be seen easily from the mechanics of the circular motion of a single object in a circular orbit about a small central mass.  Setting the centripetal acceleration equal to the gravitational acceleration gives

v2/r = GM/r2

where r =  radius, v = velocity, M = cluster mass, and G = the gravitational constant.  From this relationship, we can solve for M

M = v2r/G

or for v

v = (GM/r)1/2

Notice that the velocity decreases as the radius increases.

Dynamics of Galaxies

Nothing came of Zwicky's remarkable result for almost 40 years.  Then, Vera Rubin and W.K. Ford stunned the astronomy community by reporting new spectroscopic measurements showing that stars in spiral galaxies rotate about galactic centers at about the same speed, independent of radial distance. Based on the brightness of the central "bulge," astronomers had assumed that most of the mass was concentrated there, where it would have produced a solar system-like distribution of velocities, decreasing with distance from the center. In the face of disbelief and criticism, Rubin and Ford stood their ground, and their results were in fact borne out by subsequent work in both spirals and ellipticals. Astronomers thus faced a stark choice: either Newton's law of gravitation did not hold over the size of the galaxy--about a hundred thousand light-years across--or galaxies contained substantial amounts of "dark matter," including in regions where very few stars were seen.

Schematic diagram of a gravitational lens

Schematic diagram of a gravitational lens

This image shows the galactic cluster Abell 1689, whose gravity distorts images of galaxies behind it (in the line of sight) through gravitational lensing. The mass obtained from lensing is far larger than the mass obtained from the luminous matter that is observed.

This image shows the galactic cluster Abell 1689, whose gravity distorts images of galaxies behind it (in the line of sight) through gravitational lensing.  The mass obtained from lensing is far larger than the mass obtained from the luminous matter that is observed.  Image credit: NASA, N. Benitez (JHU), T. Broadhurst (The Hebrew University), H. Ford (JHU), M. Clampin(STScI), G. Hartig (STScI), G. Illingworth (UCO/Lick Observatory), the ACS Science Team and ESA

Gravitational Lensing

An altogether different line of evidence for dark matter emerges from observations of gravitational lensing, the distortion in images of distant galaxies produced by the gravitational force of galaxies along the line of sight (see diagram). Look at the image of the Abell cluster of galaxies to see characteristic arcs produced by lensing. The mass distribution of the cluster was determined 1) by gravitational lensing and 2) by emitted light from the cluster, and the two masses were quite different, with the lensing mass corresponding to the results described above for galaxies and clusters of galaxies. A related technique called "weak lensing," which is a statistical study of tiny distortions of background galaxies seen in galactic surveys, provided further evidence.

Cosmology

Detailed studies of the microwave background radiation showed that the ordinary matter in the universe lacks the mutual gravitational force to produce the density fluctuations that led to the formation of stars and galaxies. To say this another way, the temperature and pressure of the ordinary matter were too high to enable the gravitational contraction of gas clouds to occur. Dark matter is therefore required for the existence of our universe.

So what are potential candidates for dark matter?

Protons, neutrons, and electrons (baryonic matter)

Atoms and molecules are excluded, because they would give off or absorb light. But cosmology severely constrains the possible amount of baryonic matter, because the relative abundance of hydrogen and helium is extremely sensitive to the amount of baryonic matter present in the early universe, which must be within a few percent of the matter that we now observe.

Non-barionic Matter

This category, which includes neutrinos, is the weakly interacting massive particles, or "WIMPs." These include

  • hot dark matter (neutrinos, which move near the speed of light)
  • warm dark matter (slower, but still relativistic)
  • cold dark matter (nonrelativistic)

Some WIMPs predicted by the theory of supersymmetry are candidates for dark matter (This theory would double the number of particles by positing a counterpart, or "super partner," for each species of particle of ordinary matter).

This leaves physics in a quandary: Considering both dark matter and dark energy, which is quite a story in itself, the composition of the universe is as follows:

  • 5% ordinary matter
  • 25% dark matter
  • 70% dark energy (and we have no idea what dark energy is)

< Previous | Next >